Furūq Fiqhīyyah ʽinda Ibn ʽĀbidīn fī Kitābihi Radd al-Muḥtār ʽala al-Darr al-Mukhtār [The Jurisprudence Differences According to Ibn Abdeen in His Book Radd al-Muhtar ‘ala Durr al-Mukhtar]

Abstract

Jurisprudence Differences arose with the beginning of the emergence of Islamic Jurisprudence.
This is due to the jurisprudence differences is part of the Islamic Jurisprudence and its branches;
and it is possible to distinguish between similar branches. The importance of this study appears
from the importance of Jurisprudence Differences and its place in legal studies, and the great
importance of this part in the fields of Islamic studies. In addition to the great benefits and
effects that it entails. Jurisprudence Differences also helps to correct the measurement when the
difference is correct, or weak in preventing it; because it needs careful research and deep study.
The research will be limited to the jurisprudence differences mentioned by Imam Ibn Abidin in
his book Radd al-Muhtar on Durr al-Mukhtar whether he devised it himself or transmitted it
from others and chose it, or transmitted it from others and remained silent about it or rejected
it and responded to it. The researcher will collect similar issues In the picture and the different
in the judgment, which Ibn Abidin referred to as a statement or an allusion, and studying it and
explaining the reason for the difference in it. So, the method of this research is to follow the
inductive method and the descriptive method. Through this research, the secrets of legislation,
the purposes of revelation, the wisdom and merits of religion will be revealed, and the details
of matters will be known. This study will be an encouragement for any scholars or students who
would like them to make their studies in this field.