Furūq Fiqhiyyāh ʽinda Al-Imām Ibn ʽabidīn Fī Kitābihi Radd Al-Muḥtar ʽala Al-Darr Al-Mukhtār: Dirāsat Tamhīdiyyāh [Jurisprudential Differences According to Imam Ibn Abidin in His Book Rad Al-Mukhtar on Al-Durr Al-Mukhtar: A Preliminary Study]

Murad Radwan Hassan AlSharif; Nizaita Omar; Zulkifly Muda; Mohd Sufian Moktar; Mohd Suhaimi Abas; Farah Diana Mohmad Zali

Murad Radwan Hassan AlSharif College of Islamic Sciences
Nizaita Omar Faculty of Islamic Contemporary Studies
Zulkifly Muda Former Mufti of Terengganu State
Mohd Sufian Moktar Centre for Fundamental Studies
Mohd Suhaimi Abas Centre for Fundamental Studies
Farah Diana Mohmad Zali Centre for Fundamental Studies

Abstract

There are many disciplines under the sciences of Islamic law. The most important one among
the fields is the sciences of jurisprudence, whereby it stresses on people’s relationship with God
from worship, supplication, prayer, fasting, zakat and pilgrim. One of the many branches is the
science of jurisprudence differences, where distinction is made between similarities; whereby
it is based on the differentiation between rulings, and where the jurists depend on many cases
and preferences. This research aims to identify the jurisprudence differences of Ibn Abidin in
his book ‘Radd al-Mukhtar on Durr al-Mukhtar’ under two chapters namely purity and prayer.
The research method follows the inductive and the descriptive method, making use of the
deductive method. The researcher will collect the similar issues in the picture and differences
in the ruling that Ibn Abidin referred to, either explicitly or allusively, study them and explain
the reason for the differences. This study will be a key for any scholars or students who would
like to pursue their studies in this field.